Thursday, November 19, 2009

Novels open doors

As an English major, I enjoyed last weeks readings and how they linked the appreciation of Literature (which seems so undervalued these days) to better overall citizenship. Part of the reason that I switched from Biochemistry to English my sophomore year was precisely that interest in seeing things from alternative perspectives. I originally enjoyed science for similar reasons, being able to look at things from the viewpoints of physics, chemistry, biology, neurology, ecology, etc., helps one develop an appreciation for the complexity of the universe. However as my study of science progressed into college, when science took on a much more technical aspect, my interest slowly faded and moved into English. I must admit I always hated English growing up, and it wasn't until my Junior year of high school that I first enjoyed a work of literature. I didn't get a chance to mention it in class, but Kate Chopin's "The Awakening" was the first book that really moved me and opened my mind up to other ways of thinking. For those unfamiliar about the work, it is a novel of early feminist literature, that portrays the life of a woman in the conservative, Creole deep south. It was the firs book I ever underlined in and it has strongly influenced the way I looked at everything since. I have since been moved by many other things that I have read, though I am personally not as great a fan of novels as Nussbaum appears to be. I personally like poetry much better, especially in conveying alternative perspectives, because it must be engaged much more actively and therefore challenges the mind more, but that is just my two cents.

2 comments:

  1. Joe,
    I like your post (basically because it has scienc-y things in it)! I agree that science at Loras has a technical aspect, but there's also still a great deal of critical thinking in the science world. For example--why don't my bacteria cooperate with me when I'm trying to do some simple genetic engineering?! So many things have gone wrong, and the experiments don't always work as they appear when written on paper. There's tons of outside perspectives that need to be taken into consideration!! Nonetheless, I don't doubt that these outside viewpoints aren't used in literature.

    As much as I don't enjoy reading, I will consider reading "The Awakening." Your personal narrative here gave me an outside perspective, so I'll see what this book's all about (might not happen any time soon, but it will happen)!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Joe, I agree with you that literature has a way of moving people far more than say science. No offense Kelli but most science doesn't really play into peoples' emotions the same way literature does. That's why I think story telling, especially our churches' stories, can help create a sense of pride and some other emotional connections with these churches and washington neighborhood. Science tends to focus just on facts. Facts can be proven and are therefore the only reliable pieces of evidence in story telling. But facts can be boring. Would Titanic have been a successful movie without Leo and Kate? I think not. And that's why emotions are central to storytelling.

    And yes, I just referenced the Titanic. Eat your heart out Lit Majors.

    ReplyDelete